Jump to content

Talk:Lillian Glass/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=Lillian+Glass++VH-1+Red+Hot+Red+Carpet&d=4623987712722748&mkt=en-US&setlang=en-US&w=92d563fb,da8950e5
    Triggered by \bcc\.bingj\.com\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 20:25, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 06:18, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:51, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Article cleanup

The article has a generally promotional tone and contains a lot of information more suitable to a curriculum vita than an encyclopedia article. It has also been extensively edited by a series of SPAs. I intend to spend some time cleaning the thing up and bringing it more into line with a standard biographical article. This would be a good place to discuss the edits that I'm making - thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 12:41, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

The "Publications" section was particularly bad, reflecting a long and detailed list of publications and implying that Glass had authored material for all of them. It was too detailed and needed to be shorter in any event; but upon my review, I discovered that several of the links turned out to be links to PR or other promotional sites featuring Glass and making the same claims about her publications; or to articles in which she was not the author at all but merely mentioned - sometimes in passing. Rather than parse the entire thing for the perhaps one or two articles that she had actually written, and for which a direct source could be identified, I removed it all. Please discuss restoration of individual items here before restoring. Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 14:32, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
A lot of the references were incorrectly formatted and I've fixed those (marginally). Substantively, I removed lengthy lists of TV shows, "celebrity clients", and publications as more worthy of a self-published biography than an encyclopedia article. I also removed a dozen or more references that established the exact same point as an existing ref, and which had led to long strings of footnote markers. Many other references were generic links to one or another organization or website, and did not support the proposition for which they were being cited. I removed those and noted the need for a citation. The refs need more work, both in format and in substance, but both they and the article are substantially leaner now and - in my view - represent a substantial improvement over what was there before. One can read this article and gain quite a full understanding of the subject's work and career, without having to wade through a lot of extra (and in many cases blatantly promotional) material. JohnInDC (talk) 16:45, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
I note that an IP editor, an SPA working only on matters relating to the subject, has begun to restore, without comment, material that I've removed for the reasons I've given here. At least one of the restorations was simply incorrect - adding back in a course of study, with a reference, where the course of study was not mentioned in the reference at all. I ask the editor to please discuss his or her concerns here rather than simply undoing the necessary work that I have done. Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 11:42, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
The article contained this sentence: "In a civil case where the plaintiff was awarded no compensation by mock jury, the plaintiff was later awarded a $33 million verdict after working with Glass as his litigation consultant." The ref was an (unlinked) LA Times article. I found the original, here - http://articles.latimes.com/2003/nov/20/local/me-doc20 - and determined that while the plaintiff did recover $33 million, nothing was reported about a mock trial or the subject's role in obtaining the eventual award. Because the statement is thus completely unreferenced, I've removed it. JohnInDC (talk) 20:37, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
The anon SPA editor has again without comment restored a variety of material I'd removed, and discussed here, some of of the restorations being objectively incorrect. I've left comments at the editor's Talk page, here, strongly suggesting that the editor come and discuss their concerns here rather than just revert my cleanup efforts. I am especially concerned given the history of this page, which reflects substantial & repeated SPA involvement, as well as the fact that a prior version of the page (deleted, hence no edit history here) had been extensively edited by a paid representative of the subject, as well as (to a lesser extent) by the subject herself. See this edit from 2010. I would of course welcome participation by the IP, as well as any comments by any disinterested editor; thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 00:38, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lillian Glass. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:44, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lillian_Glass/Archive_1&oldid=1158456371"