Talk:Light Attack/Armed Reconnaissance
A fact from Light Attack/Armed Reconnaissance appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 March 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LAAR vs LAS
[edit]This article conflates the LAS and LAAR programs. The LAS (Light Air Support) is Request for Proposal (RFP) solicitation #FA8637-10-R-6000. This is the program that the AT-6 lost and that the Super Tucano won. The LAAR (Light Attack/Armed Reconnaissance) Request for Information (RFI) is presolicitation #Light_Attack_Armed_Reconnaissance_(LAAR). Neither of these should be confused with the Advanced Flight Trainer / Light Attack Aircraft (AFT/LAA), Sources Sought solicitation #FA8615-10-R-ZZ01. --Donbock (talk) 19:19, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Source
[edit]There's a lot of information on the subject here, that I don't have time to parse through, but perhaps someone else would find it possible to do so... - The Bushranger (talk) 18:38, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the link! I'll take a look when I get some free time, unless someone else beats me to it! -SidewinderX (talk) 19:44, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Additional Information
[edit]I was going to add the armament and performance specifications for the competing aircraft, but as another user said it might be better if I were to leave that info on the Planes dedicated wiki pages. Regardless should we put links to the corporations "Light Attack/Armed Reconnaissance" websites dedicated to the competition in a references section? For example http://www.802u.com/ is the Air Tractor page for the AT-802U while Boeing has an OV-10X brochure that has been distributed to the public.
Also should we write a basic description for the A-67 and the M-346. Compared to the others they seem to be lacking.--Lostend (talk) 18:18, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- If you have links to the aircraft's specific page, feel free to link them in the Light_Attack/Armed_Reconnaissance#External_links section. If you have a source, and can cite it, feel free to add desctiptions of the A-67 and the M-346. Although I'd keep it specific to the variant that plans to be proposed for the LAAR (i.e., not the trainer M-346). -SidewinderX (talk) 00:17, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- How about the BuiltForTheMission website? Too adsy? http://builtforthemission.com/las-mission.php Hcobb (talk) 15:00, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Merging
[edit]Shouldnt this article be merged with Counter-insurgency aircraft? Its effectively the same combat type just under a different name?--Blockhaj (talk) 20:28, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
- This article is for a specific procurement program for a COIN aircraft ---EngineeringEditor (talk) 14:43, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:53, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- C-Class aviation articles
- C-Class aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- C-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- C-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles