Talk:Lieutenant Governor of British Columbia

Canada: British Columbia / Governments Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Governments of Canada.

Requested move

Lieutenant-Governor of British Columbia → Lieutenant Governor of British Columbia —(Discuss)— "Lieutenant Governor of British Columbia" is the proper name of the office. Neither the Constitution of Canada nor the province itself make reference to a "Lieutenant-Governor". —Ibagli (Talk) 21:18, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem with that, but I see no reason why "Lieutenant Governor of British Columbia" or "Lieutenant-Governor of British Columbia" should redirect to a list. If this move is made, "Lieutenant-Governor of British Columbia" should redirect to "Lieutenant Governor of British Columbia". Agent 86 21:33, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page moved, per request. -GTBacchus^(talk) 01:42, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

comment Quite frankly, without the hyphen it looks "modern" and, while it seems the Office of the L-G doesn't use it anymore, perhaps because their style-guideist or web designer homogenized the old BC usage with the rest of Canada, it's a historical fact that it was widely used in BC, and can be seen in the title in the refernces They Gave Royal Assent - The Lieutenant-Governors of British Columbia. and also, if you read the BC papers, you'll see the abbreviation/acronym L-G from time to time; but not "LG" or "L G". The hyphen's part of our culture. Or was, that is; I've been reading older-era histories and can't recall if one historian uses it and the other doesn't; but it's a valid usage, at least historically, and need not be snitted at....(and for those of us of a certain vintage oureslves, we still use it even though it's not in the official style guide or "modern English"....more's the pity.Skookum1 (talk) 03:13, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:DavidLam.jpg

The image Image:DavidLam.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --20:57, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Comment: Should the term "viceroy" be used as a synonym for "Governor General" or "Lieutenant Governor" in articles on Canadian government?

I have started an RfC on this question at Talk:Governor General of Canada. All comments welcome. --Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 14:42, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Prakash Javadekar meeting the Lieutenant Governor of British Columbia, Ms. Janet Austin and explains the significant educational reforms currently underway in India, in Victoria, Canada.JPG

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:59, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]