Talk:Libidinal Economy

Philosophy: Literature / Social and political / Continental / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Social and political philosophy
	Continental philosophy
	Contemporary philosophy

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

any chance of a simple summary of the thesis?

If someone could dumb down the main thrust of the book for us hoi polloi, that would make for a better article. The article just got linked to from the New Yorker as a reference for the phrase "libidinal economy", but it tells me nothing about what the libidinal economy is conceived to be. - Metalello ^talk 07:18, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Elephant in the room: pedophilia

Are we going to pretend that this book isn't for paedos? The system won't even allow me to say the word, that just tells me that this article is being written by the worst people on the planet. Anthonycrc (talk) 17:28, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]