Talk:Liberal theism

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Religion Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of religion

Relevance

Is there anyone who actually adheres to this 'position'? I mean, it sure sounds like a position your mom or my brother might defend, but are there any notable theologians or philosophers? If not, it might still be relevant on account of its being widespread among laypeople, but there is no indication of that in the article either. To be honest, I never came across this term before. The offered solutions to the problem of evil and the question about the impossible rock do seem pretty shallow. And the different aspects of the position seem to be only loosely connected. So, I'm wondering: Is this really a thing?--TheseusX (talk) 09:14, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]