Talk:Liabeae

Flora of North America

There seems to be pressure to cite efloras.org here. Am I mistaken about this? The information that has been deleted was gathered from a paper which they would be citing to make their online flora with, or put another way, the information from efloras would be people rewriting things from that paper. Is it a necessity that this article must cite a flora which cites the paper to keep information from being deleted here? -- carol (talk) 06:13, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is necessary that information sourced to the Robinson article actually be what the Robinson article says. Please read page 3 of that article. --Blechnic (talk) 06:21, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Read the reference you've quoted

You continue to misquote the reference you are citing. It does not say, or even suggest " The differences between this tribe and Vernonieae after the recent reclassification were fine enough that they are further described by Harold E. Robinson in his 'Generic review of the tribe Liabeae (Asteraceae)'," in the Robinson article. On the contrary, Robinson clarifies that the two tribes are quite distinct. Please read the source you are citing and cite it accurately, or at least not the complete opposite of what it says. The entire source is on-line and available. --Blechnic (talk) 06:19, 1 July 2008 (UTC) wat the hell??????!!!!? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.186.8.253 (talk) 04:03, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]