Talk:Lex scripta

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Latin Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge proposal

These two pages seem to have the exact same scope, and include virtually identical information. Is there some reason that I am missing that these should be separate? (see also: Lex non scripta and ius non scriptum) Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 09:36, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As nobody has weighed in on this, I've gone ahead and redirected ius scriptum here – there doesn't seem to be any content to merge. Going to treat ius non scriptum and lex non scripta similarly. Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 19:18, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]