Jump to content

Talk:Lever House

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleLever House is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 16, 2023.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 2, 2021Good article nomineeListed
August 8, 2023Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 20, 2023Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 8, 2021.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Lever House (pictured), slated for replacement with a larger building in the 1980s, was protected as a New York City landmark with a one-vote majority?
Current status: Featured article

Untitled

[edit]

this article is badly written and cites little sources. What's with the 'heat resistant glass'? Shouldn't it be light filtering glass rather? Or the 'stainless steel curtain wall to maintain property', maybe this refers to maintaining an aspect of cleanness? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.246.161.39 (talk) 09:56, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lever House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:29, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk05:55, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lever House
Lever House

Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 21:37, 3 July 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Great GA on excellent sources, offline sources accepted AGF, no copyvio obvious. The image is licensed, and a good reminder of what we talk about. I slightly prefer ALT1, because most of the original ("imitated") I knew. Just waiting for the qpq. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:59, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Gerda Arendt: Thanks for the review. I've done a QPQ now. Epicgenius (talk) 16:16, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
thank you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:08, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Epicgenius and Gerda Arendt: Looking to promote this, I note the reviewer prefers ALT1 but also notes the picture would be good. However, to me, ALT0 is the hook that works with the picture (design mentioned). Do either of you have preference of hook or image? Kingsif (talk) 06:56, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I care more about the image than the hook. ALT1 is more dramatic, because the original just speaks about "historic landmark", not the consequence of demolition if not, - too harmless. That the building was imitated worldwide was not new for me, I knew it as iconic, about the first thing to see the first time in NYC, but if this is not known well enough, could we word something in a combination? My guess is, though, that the image will be reminder enough: "Ah, that one!" --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:04, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Kingsif: I don't really mind either way, but Gerda's reasoning sounds good. The building is well known in the architectural community, so its landmark status and worldwide appeal could stand out in a hook. Epicgenius (talk) 15:07, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Picture is clear, will make more impact on architecture community, and support hook for everyone else. Kingsif (talk) 17:45, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]