Talk:Lev Shestov

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Philosophy: Philosophers Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers

Russia: Science & education Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the science and education in Russia task force.

The City of Dreadful Night

What is the rationale behind the thomson quote? It is not clear whether shestov read thomson, or whether somebody writing this entry found their outlooks comparable. If the latter, it seems inappropriate to quote such a large amount of thomson... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.144.236.112 (talk) 01:16, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree; I have removed the James Thomson quote, as well as references to The Lev Shestov Society homepage (http://shestov.by.ru/index.html), which is no longer online. Languagehat (talk) 19:12, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lev Shestov. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131101135147/http://www.utoronto.ca/tsq/DS/06/143.shtml to https://www.utoronto.ca/tsq/DS/06/143.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:16, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Existentialist

Shestov and Fondane both despised the existentialists and Fondane distinguished both his own philosophy and his teacher's from existentialism in his criticisms of Sartre. The scholarship portraying him as an 'existentialist' is quite dated (refer to Fondane's Existential Monday & the Sunday of History). Would anyone object if I removed that adjective?

--68.134.230.117 (talk) 17:41, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

nebuch

> 'Reason' is the obedience to and the acceptance of Certainties that tell us that certain things are eternal and unchangeable and other things are impossible and can never be attained. This accounts for Shestov's philosophy being a form of irrationalism, though it is important to note that the thinker does not oppose reason, or science in general, but only rationalism and scientism: the tendency to consider reason as a sort of omniscient, omnipotent God that is good for its own sake. It may also be considered a form of personalism: people cannot be reduced to ideas, social structures, or mystical oneness. Shestov rejects any mention of "omnitudes", "collective", "all-unity."

no source and the statement is completly unrelated to shestovs thoughts,its dishonest to call him not opposed to reason and would require revisionist reading of the worst kind. 5.46.204.235 (talk) 06:05, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]