Talk:Lepraria incana

Lepraria incana has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: November 11, 2021. (Reviewed version).

Fungi: Lichens Low‑importance

	Fungi portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Lichen task force (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lepraria incana/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: J Milburn (talk · contribs) 14:29, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is a really stellar article; I have basically nothing to add. (I think I have only said this once or twice before, meaning fewer than 1% of reviews!)

I have made a few tiny edits. Please double-check them to make sure you're happy.
If this was at FAC, I think I might press for a bit more clarity on the issue of distribution. I appreciate that this is far from an easy request, but at least there could be a bit more linkage between what is said in the article and what is said in the lead. (One of my changes related to this.)
Again, if this was at FAC, I think I might push for a bit more about non-fungal partners.

Anyway, that's all I have to say right now. If you're happy with my edits, I'm happy to go ahead and promote the article. Josh Milburn (talk) 14:29, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you for the copyedits, and things to think about in the future. I've pretty much tapped my sources about this species, but plan to create a few more articles about other Lepraria species, so I might find some additional tidbits to add to this one. Esculenta (talk) 05:39, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great; I'm promoting now, then. I'll keep my eyes open for any future nominations, but I'm not around as much as I used to be, so I may miss it. Josh Milburn (talk) 19:19, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]