Talk:Leopold Eidlitz
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Cyrus
[edit]Is this person the same as Cyrus L.W. Eidlitz listed at Eidlitz, or otherwise related? Gene Nygaard 08:41, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
See also
[edit]This section is supposed to be for related topics not already referenced in the article. Both Cyrus L. W. Eidlitz and Marc Eidlitz are identified in the article and linked, so do not belong in this section, per WP. Parkwells (talk) 23:25, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, there is no policy which covers the "see also" section, there is only a guideline, which says:
In deciding whether a link should be in the see also section or not, we should always keep the needs of the readers in mind. We should not require them to go searching back through the article for a link when they're through reading the text and are sitting at the "see also" section, when we have the capability of providing them with a link right where they are already for something they're likely to want to know more about. Thus, mere repetition should never be a hard-and-fast rule, there should always be a common-sense evaluation on whether the links in that place to those subjects will be helpful to the reader or not. I believe the links I provided there would be helpful, or else I wouldn't have put them there in the first place. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:48, 27 January 2012 (UTC)Whether a link belongs in the "See also" section is ultimately a matter of editorial judgment and common sense. The links in the "See also" section should be relevant, should reflect the links that would be present in a comprehensive article on the topic, and should be limited to a reasonable quantity. As a general rule the "See also" section should not repeat links which appear in the article's body or its navigation boxes. Thus, many high-quality, comprehensive articles do not have a "See also" section.
The links in the "See also" section do not have to be directly related to the topic of the article, because one purpose of the "See also" links is to enable readers to explore topics that are only peripherally relevant.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Leopold Eidlitz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120615172125/http://communities.aia.org/sites/hdoaa/wiki/Wiki%20Pages/ahd1012417.aspx to http://communities.aia.org/sites/hdoaa/wiki/Wiki%20Pages/ahd1012417.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:32, 25 May 2017 (UTC)