Talk:Lego Indiana Jones 2: The Adventure Continues/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: ProtoDrake (talk · contribs) 14:50, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
I'll review this. And...I'm already seeing a ton of problems.
- Infobox is full of staff members who aren't mentioned anywhere else in the article. Also, I don't see any confirmation in-article that the handheld version was developed by TT Fusion.
- Lead needs expanding, and no need for citations there.
- Gameplay...is okay, but doesn't show the genre or really give me a feel for what the gameplay is. Also, the entire final sentence doesn't seem right for the gameplay section, and the last part is uncited.
- Development section's next to non-existent. I realise there are/may be sourcing problems, but it's still very barebones. I found this page which has associated links and information that could've been used to expand it (not using the website unless there's no other way obviously, but they provide links for use).
- Reception section is again sparse at best, with nothing but scores and vague summaries. This should be at least a couple or three paragraphs, but there's nothing about the mechanics or anything that makes it look like more than a Wikia copy-paste.
- Incomplete citations without archiving. Also, VGChartz is unreliable and can't be used to cite sales.
- Overall inconsistent linking.
I feel these problems are too extensive for the duration of a GA review, so I'm going to reluctantly Fail this. In all honest, I think the best solution would be to merge the Lego Indy game articles into one. --ProtoDrake (talk) 14:50, 27 July 2022 (UTC)