Talk:Left List

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Section sizes

Section size for Left List (7 sections)
Section name	Byte count	Section total
(Top)	1,910	1,910
History	668	11,756
The crisis in Respect	3,880	3,880
Left List emerges	5,236	5,236
Left Alternative	1,972	1,972
See also	157	157
References	260	260
Total	14,083	14,083

Did George Galloway Call for John Rees Resignation?

(cur) (last) 23:00, 11 April 2008 Charliewbrown (Talk | contribs) (8,092 bytes) (→The crisis in Respect: GG did not call for Rees' resignation!) (undo)

I am aware that several members of the SWP central committee stated that George Galloway called for John Rees's resignation to an audience of over 200+ people (of which I was present). They stated that George Galloway called for John Rees resignation at a Respect leadership meeting that took place before "the letter" was published. I don't think at any point George Galloway denied this.

Where might I be able to find a reference for this?

I therefore assume that you're a member of the SWP, (as I was until recently) and this was the London-wide members meeting in September.

Far from calling for Rees' resignation, George called for the appointment of a National Organiser to support the National Secretary in his/her duties. In fact, in an attempt to be diplomatic, George nominated Nick Wrack, a leading member of the SWP, for the post. This, and all the other suggestions in the letter from George, were accepted and voted for unanimously by the National Council before the split. And then the lies and deceit started...

You won't find a reference for George calling for Rees' resignation, because no such call was made.--Charliewbrown (talk) 08:26, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move to 'Left Alternative'

The rename is now quite official, with the latest bulletin saying that the respectcoalition.org email address stops working this week. We should move this from Left List to Left Alternative. --Duncan (talk) 15:48, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've created Left Alternative and Left List now redirects there. Bondegezou (talk) 15:59, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ideology and position

The infobox for this article has long listed Left Alternative's ideology as "socialism" and their position as "far left". User:Helper201 has removed these and re-removed them after I provided citations, arguing the citations were insufficient.

Helper201: what ideology and/or position do you believe best describes Left Alternative if not socialism and far left?

I cited "Against the Grain: The British Far Left from 1956", edited by Evan Smith & Matthew Worley, which mentions the Left List (the initial name for the Left Alternative) and describes it as being formed by the Socialist Workers Party (SWP). The SWP is described on its Wikipedia article as far left for position, and Marxism/Neo-Trotskyism/Revolutionary socialism for ideology.

For the Left Alternative's ideology, I cited this article, which says, "The Left List is standing leading anti-war campaigner and socialist Lindsey German". Helper201 argues this is insufficient because it only shows that German is socialist, not the Left List/Alternative in general. But German was one of the most significant figures in the party, and her candidacy then perhaps the party's most significant electoral contest. I think that's sufficient connection. I will look for further citations, but it seems to me that those provided and the article as a whole are sufficient. Bondegezou (talk) 09:42, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just because an article has long stated something does not mean it is any more valid. I do not proclaim to know the ideologies or the position of the party. I am just making sure correct evidence is provided for any claims. Just because a party is formed by another party does not mean it has an identical position or ideologies.

As for your claim on ideology, as said a persons individual ideological identification does not in turn mean the party has the same ideology. For example, one of the co-convenors of the Scottish Green Party, Maggie Chapman, identifies as a socialist, but the party doesn't self identify as a socialist party. Helper201 (talk) 15:30, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have provided several citations. Given you've deleted these, I presume you've looked at them. Having read them all, what do you think the ideology/political position of Left Alternative is? Bondegezou (talk) 21:03, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Left Alternative. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:15, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Left Alternative. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:41, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]