Talk:Le Droit Humain

Freemasonry Mid‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Freemasonry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freemasonry articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to join us in our labors, please join the discussion and add your name to the list of participants. The "Top of the Trestleboard" section below can offer some ideas on where to start and what to do.FreemasonryWikipedia:WikiProject FreemasonryTemplate:WikiProject FreemasonryFreemasonry articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

◆ WikiProject Freemasonry's "Top of the Trestleboard":

Improve to Featured Article status
Add content to stubs…
Check recently changed articles for possible improvement, to remove vandalism, etc.
Requests
[Watch this list]
- Articles for all United Grand Lodge of England-recognized Grand Lodges (if notable)
Participate in articles listed for deletion
Need images
New Article to be created

Comments on assessment

I ranked this with the orders such as DeMolay International and Order of the Eastern Star - there's definitely a case for it to be High-importance, where I put York Rite and Scottish Rite. I'm trying to save Top-importance for Freemasonry, Masonic lodge, etc. -- the things that are essential to all of us.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:04, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Views on abortion

In the talk page Talk:Catholicism and Freemasonry/Archive 10, it was claimed that since Le Droit Humain includes women in their lodges, many had adopted a feminist ideology and had contributed to the the pro-choice movement in order to repeal current or former laws prohibiting women from obtaining an abortion on demand. The article should perhaps provide relevant information on the social and political positions of Le Droit Human, and try to verify whether that includes support for a woman's right to an abortion. ADM (talk) 22:58, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Section: British Federation

Added new section on British Federation Comason (talk) 21:43, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Added external link for British Federation Comason (talk) 19:11, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://ledroithumain.international/how-it-works/?lang=en. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:43, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]