Talk:Lazy user model

Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Engineering Mid‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Systems Mid‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Systems engineering.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 October 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

WP:NOR

"Wikipedia does not publish original research or original thought. This includes unpublished facts, arguments, speculation, and ideas; and any unpublished analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to advance a position. This means that Wikipedia is not the place to publish your own opinions, experiences, or arguments.

Citing sources and avoiding original research are inextricably linked. To demonstrate that you are not presenting original research, you must cite reliable sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and that directly support the information as it is presented."

This article appears to violate WP:NOR and should be deleted unless cites for reliable sources can be added to it. A home page is not enough. Mervyn Emrys (talk) 18:00, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NRVE

The paper that puts forth this theory has only been cited twice according to Scholarometer. Therefore, wouldn't meet notability guidelines.Linclark (talk) 20:25, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Considerations - user perception

It might be useful for the reader to understand that there is a distinction between actions that the user expects to require more effort and those actions that actually do. There are related psychological studies that might be referenced, for example, "Perceived difficulty in the theory of planned behaviour: Perceived behavioural control or affective attitude?", which explores factors such as affective attitude and confidence. full text It seems to me that the article is crying out for references to psychology and cognitive theory, but perhaps it depends on the extent to which certain ideas can be shown to have directly influenced the development of the model itself?

Obviously, there are already theory-related references in the "See Also" section, but I was imagining that some of that associated information could be expanded into the article itself, to show how those topics relate, at least. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.47.59 (talk) 18:20, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]