Talk:Lawrence Venuti
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lawrence Venuti article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Schleiermacher
[edit]This article has a section on thought and influence, but it includes nothing on the thinkers whose thought influenced Venuti. At the very least there should be some mention of Friedrich Schleiermacher's 1813 lecture "Ueber die verschiedenen Methoden des Uebersezens" ("On the Different Methods of Translating"), which is generally recognized as the primary landmark in the intellectual tradition Venuti pursues; another is obviously Antoine Berman, who was also heavily influenced by Henri Meschonnic. The fact is, there are TWO dominant traditions in Western translation theory, one, which Venuti opposes, variously called "sense-for-sense translation" or "dynamic equivalence" (Nida) or "bringing the author to the reader" (Scheiermacher) or "fluency" or "domestication" (Venuti), the other, which Venuti champions, variously called "word-for-word translation" or "literalism" or "formal equivalence" (Nida) or "taking the reader to the author" (Schleiermacher) or "foreignization" (Venuti). The Schleiermacher/Berman/Venuti tradition introduces some important innovations to the literalist approach, and so has often been called neoliteralist; while literalism was dominant in some earlier periods, neoliteralism has mainly been oppositional for the last two centuries. But it IS an established tradition, and it seems myopic not to mention it here. The result of this article's silence about that countertradition is to make Venuti sound like a lone pioneer fighting an overwhelming orthodoxy.
Also, can we get a birth date? Hong12kong (talk) 23:11, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Lawrence Venuti. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.temple.edu/english/People/VenutiL.asp - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110622022714/http://www.gf.org/fellows/results?query=venuti&lower_bound=1925&upper_bound=2010&competition=ALL&fellowship_category=ALL&x=13&y=7 to http://www.gf.org/fellows/results?query=venuti&lower_bound=1925&upper_bound=2010&competition=ALL&fellowship_category=ALL&x=13&y=7
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110709014904/http://www.despalabro.com/pdf/espectros/V.pdf to http://www.despalabro.com/pdf/espectros/V.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:23, 18 December 2017 (UTC)