This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
I will not doubt the skill of this man in any way, however, the tone of the introduction irks me. It is written as if it was a boastful resume. Certainly we can do better?
--132.161.220.21 (talk) 03:18, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Completely agree. The language and tone is way over the top! In addition, I expect many of the claims/awards are attributable to the company/partnership, rather than solely to Scarpa. Proof would be needs that he was the lead designer and/or singled out for special mention. There is already an adequate article, Pugh + Scarpa, which details the company's achievements. Sionk (talk) 14:49, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
