Talk:Laurentian Fan

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geography Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Proper Name

While I understand there are subtle differences between abyss, trench, fan and valley, considering that its official name is the "Laurentain Abyss" shouldn't that be the name this page is under? 173.209.103.10 (talk) 20:16, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Info

Im looking for some location and charting information for the Laurentian Abyss. I know that it exists on Oceanography maps but do not have any to get significant information from. Anyone who comes across this page and doese plese post it on the main definition page. -Thanks, LeibstandarteAdH

Excerpt

Here is an excerpt from another site:

The deep ocean floor is mostly flat but there are quite a few seamounts, guyots and deeps or trenches. The deepest trench in the North Atlantic is the Puerto Rico Trench at 8,605 meters, in the South Atlantic it is the South Sandwich Trench at 8,428 meters and near the equator is the Romanche Trench at 7,454 meters. The deepest point in the Atlantic is at 8,605 meters and is called the Milwaukee Deep, an area located in the Puerto Rico Trench. Off the eastern coast of Canada is the Laurentian Abyss. The shelves that run along the edges of the continents make up approximately 11% of the bottom topography in addition to several deep channels that cut across the continental rise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.166.156.10 (talk • contribs)

What's the other site? If it's a reliable source we can cite it here.--Tbeatty 18:30, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above information was cited from: http://marinebio.org/Oceans/Geography.asp –LeibstandarteAdH 15:12, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This info can add to the Laurentian Abyss main page but still leaves much to be desired such as coordnates and depth/depths. As i said which i believe can be gained from simple oceanographic charts if anyone has acess. That does not make the above information any less relevent, and should still be added. --165.166.156.10 18:32, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Confused

- - - - I am confused about something noted in the Laurentian Abyss article. At the end, it states that "the actual deepest point is the Challenger Deep in the Pacific Ocean." Yet when I went to the Wikipedia article about the Challenger Deep, Wikipedia states that it is the "third deepest point." Ok, one article is in need of correction.************

This whole article is a joke. The "sources" are erroneous, less than credible, and contain little to no actual information about this supposed trench which only ever seems to appear in sci-fi. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SnOrfys (talk • contribs) 13:57, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I have spoken to a professor of Geography at Memorial University in Newfoundland, and have gathered that the Laurentian Abyss is more of an underwater valley off the eastern coast that is at most 200m below the continental shelf and at most is ~600m deep. It is a product of glaciation and the currents from the St. Lawrence Seaway. Once I get ahold of some GIS maps, I'll update. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.96.76.109 (talk) 17:59, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Marking this as needs references

This needs better depth sources. I'm marking it as citations needed. cOrneLlrOckEy (talk) 18:49, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does this exist? Can't find any valid references to it, although there is a nearby Sohm Abyssal Plain that contains an area called the Laurentian Fan. There are several references to this online (including a bouy monitoring station from NOAA), here's one from several university authors in 1983: http://www.springerlink.com/content/x3w6p49u01374pnh/

Atlas of Canada lists Sohm Abyssal and Laurentian Fan, no Laurentian Abyss. http://atlas.nrcan.gc.ca/site/english/index.html (seach for Abyss, the direct link to it is too long to post here). There is a Laurentian Gulch but it appears to be a cove area of the Newfoundland/Labrador coast. Halfdragon (talk) 22:07, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Inconsistency in the intro

First it says "Not a trench", but then it later goes on to say "The trench is the site of hydrothermal vents"; is it a trench, or isn't it?--PrintedScholar (talk) 23:05, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinate error

{{geodata-check}}

The following coordinate fixes are needed for The Laurentian abyss is located in the Atlantic Ocean. The coordinates shown (42° 4′ 56.93″ N, 52° 4′ 21.26″ E) are located in the Caspian Sea.

—50.180.41.52 (talk) 21:37, 9 June 2016 (UTC) B Scott[reply]

Done. The problem seems to have simply been a mistaken use of east longitude when it should have been west longitude. I've also tweaked the coordinates, making them less precise for such a large feature. Deor (talk) 13:48, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Laurentian fan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927235000/http://www.onefish.org/servlet/CDSServlet?status=ND0xMzgxMi43MjM5JjY9ZW4mMzM9ZG9jdW1lbnRzJjM3PWluZm8~ to http://www.onefish.org/servlet/CDSServlet?status=ND0xMzgxMi43MjM5JjY9ZW4mMzM9ZG9jdW1lbnRzJjM3PWluZm8~

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:11, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]