Talk:Laudianism

Christianity: Theology / History / Anglicanism / Arminianism Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by theology work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Christian history (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Arminianism (assessed as High-importance).

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tyacke reference

Replaced this Tyacke (Russell) reference (Nicholas Tyacke, 'Puritanism, Arminianism and Counter-revolution', Conrad Russell (ed.), The Origins of the English Civil War. MacMillan, 1st ed., 1973. ISBN 0333124006 ) with an identical reprint available on Google books (Todd). --Lexein (talk) 11:24, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tone

The tone of this article in many places is odd: without adopting polemical or anathematizing language, it seems to be patiently explaining why Laudianism is unacceptable from a Calvinist point of view (and why the Calvinist point of view is the more historic and authentic one of the Elizabethan Church...). That's as may be, but would it be more appropriate to move these points to a "criticisms" section, or a "relations with Puritans" section or some such? Q·L·1968 ☿ 20:58, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This has been corrected. Dr.Decapod (talk) 23:11, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]