Jump to content

Talk:Latvian ruble

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Latvian rublis)

Name for the Latvian Rouble.

[edit]

The Latvian name for the Rouble is Rublis. - (Aidan Work 01:15, 19 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]

Code ISO 4217

[edit]

What was the ISO code for the Latvian rubłi ? --Flafla89 19:37, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- LVR—Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.110.10.157 (talk) 15:43, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 3 November 2022

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Latvian ruble. (closed by non-admin page mover)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 07:18, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Latvian roubleLatvian rublis – In this RM (on which I am neutral) See my !vote below --NotReallySoroka (talk) 23:05, 3 November 2022 (UTC) to move this article back to its old name at "Latvian rublis", I would like to see whether TheCurrencyGuy's move to "rouble" (made ostensibly because the Latvian name, rublis, was never used in English sources) has Community consensus. Thank you. NotReallySoroka (talk) 22:58, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Latvian ruble (!voting as appellant), since it is used by the Bank of Latvia's English site, over "rouble" or "rublis". For instance, we have [1] and [2]. NotReallySoroka (talk) 23:04, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment While I am aware that WP:RMCOMMENT normally prohibits double !voting, my original RM should be deemed procedural, through wording such as the now-struck-out "on which I am neutral" or the fact that I took this RM to ask for Community consensus over TCG's move. Thank you. NotReallySoroka (talk) 23:26, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.