Talk:Lateral movement

Physics

I believe lateral movements as a physical type of motion are far more important a topic to have this article centred around, either by moving this current topic or by making it a subsection. Lateral movements apply to flight/spaceflight, driving, wave propogation, various forms of sledding, and so many more things that it is insane that there isn't already an article on it or at the very least a description. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 18:36, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I actually think you are correct; this particular article has sort of been languishing within WPEQ and we need to work on it anyway. My thoughts are as follows:

Sandbox a article on the physics concept to move into this name when we get everything else below taken care of
Move this article to the name Lateral flexions, which is the term for equine lateral movements within the dressage world, though not a universal term, or Lateral movement (horse), which would also work. (I may have to do a wee bit of research to see which term would be preferable, if you can give me a day or two)
Check the "what links here" to fix where it appears in all the horse articles
once that is done, move in the physics article to this name, and de-orphan it by finding at least three other articles we can link to here. Montanabw^(talk) 19:18, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss and resolve this issue

...before removing the message on top of the article, as is the rule. There's no basis to pretend as if the page should look like a finished and ready thing, as that is misleading to the reader. Loginnigol (talk) 20:57, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Per BRD, the person adding material has the burden to support it. That said, your tagging is absurd, the article is not at all about physics, it is about equestrianism and the editors on this article have expertise in this area, so it seems ridiculous to tag it for either reason. That said, note the discussion above; if you think we should move or rename the article so that an article on physics can be created in its place, or if there IS an article on physics elsewhere under a different title and this should be a dab, well, then let's discuss that. Random tagging is illogical here. Montanabw^(talk) 21:02, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]