Talk:Laser machine control
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Proposed merge with Laser level
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was to not merge. Kkmurray (talk) 02:36, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
I'm no expert in this field but they seem to refer to the same concept. Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 14:28, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
- No, they're quite different.
- A laser level is (broadly) a surveying tool. Laser Machine Control (an untidy article unlikely to survive long anyway) uses laser(s) to project a virtual datum surface across a construction site, then vehicles drive across this (usually manually) and use this laser datum to control their blade height. There is a para on this in laser level already, but there's plenty of scope for a separate article. Laser level itself needs substantial expansion. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:05, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
- Laser Level and Laser machine Control is different from their use, technique and working, laser level used to only create laser reference vertical or horizontal, Laser machine Control is system with multiple components. laser machine Control is of Laser level but not only laser level it has various other components which are need to be explained. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.5.201.7 (talk) 06:15, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Cleanup needed
[edit]Much of the article is barely English. There are problems with punctuation, capitalization, syntax and grammar to the extent that some passages are unintelligible. I tried copyediting it, but gave up. — QuicksilverT @ 00:41, 2 November 2013 (UTC)