Jump to content

Talk:Las Vegas Monorail

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Curtis Myles

[edit]

Re:

"Curtis Myles, an African-American and a former deputy general manager of the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada...."

Surely what qualifies him to be president is that he is a former deputy general manager, and not that he is African-American. Why is his race relevant here? It's something you'd put in the article on him, but I think it should be left out here. Ground Zero | t 21:57, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking the same thing. Race is not generally encylopedic. Vegaswikian 22:25, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He is the only African-American leader of a monorail system, and hence that is noteworthy - also, in Las Vegas, there is a disproportionately low percentage of African-Americans in positions of power, but luckily this is (albeit, unfortunately slowly) changing. --Frank Lofaro Jr. 21:44, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then he should have an article if his accomplishments are notable. Vegaswikian 23:08, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Is it true I don’t know if it’s true 2601:206:8200:AE20:CC0D:DC4B:3C7C:3648 (talk) 06:02, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Inaugeration

[edit]

1958? Is that the correct date?--Rotten 16:45, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket prices

[edit]

Something is wrong, $8 for 24 hour pass, $40 for a 3 day pass?24.158.102.77 18:12, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The regular price for the 1-day pass is $15. It seems they didn't bother to discount the 3-day pass. --Traal 15:03, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why did someone remove the prices? That seems like a bad idea as people (including myself) come to this page for that information. Poolboy8 21:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Omg 2601:206:8200:AE20:CC0D:DC4B:3C7C:3648 (talk) 06:01, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Can locals get a better deal on a 30 day pass? If not, why not?

Logo?

[edit]

Do we want to add the logo to this page for identification purposes? I have created a high quality SVG if needed. --Tvwade (talk) 19:55, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but the template should be modified to place the logo at the top of the infobox. This is done for other infoboxes as you know, like the one for casinos. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:09, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Stations

[edit]

Would it be appropriate to include some of the proposed stations such as the Thomas & Mack and the McCarren Airport? Locopingvin (talk) 15:46, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Phase 2 mention

[edit]

I have restored the previous Extensions section culled[1] by User:lvmonorail, which completely dropped the mention of Phase 2 (a dropped proposal to go towards the centre of Las Vegas) and renamed Phase 3 (to the airport) to Phase 2. This section was marked as requiring updates, and this was an update, but in a way that removed the previous history of attempts at extension and which adjusted the naming scheme away from previously located references. Some of the updates were useful, some (such as the details of the advertising contract termination) appear to be sanitising. Could other edits please review these two edits and check that nothing useful has been lost (either before, or after).

Note that I screwed up the partial revert the first time and rollbacked myself. —Sladen (talk) 03:06, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will update the extension information to include the previous plan to extend the system to Downtown Las Vegas and the current plan to extend the system to McCarran International Airport, along with a citation stating that this is fact.
Any other edits made will be for the purposes of accuracy, validity, and objectivity of the information provided.
--Lvmonorail (talk) 00:13, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why not start at the beginning?

[edit]

"After many delays, the finished Las Vegas Monorail opened to the public on July 15, 2004"

Considering that the monorail is so far a financial disaster for Las Vegas, can't someone do the newspaper research that will tell us about the planning of this fiasco?

How much debt did the first proposal involve?

How did a FOUR MILE light rail system create $700 million in debt?

If I'm not mistaken, all investment in the system, aside from a few percent held by the most privileged investors, was wiped out by the bankruptcy that lasted from January 2010 to May 2012. The how & the why of that seem particularly relevant.

Without such details this is a terrible, terrible article. Bustter (talk) 03:58, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bustter; it's been a while since I did some research for this article, and it sounds like the bankruptcy has happened in the meantime. We need reliable citation sources to work from, so if you can dig up reference material that covers the empty areas, we can add it to the article. (It's also Wiki, so you can add it yourself; just make sure new statements are sourced per WP:CITE and WP:RS). Thank you for getting involved! —Sladen (talk) 04:52, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Initial plan, December 1996

[edit]

To start: An archive search of the LV Review-Journal reveals a very different plan introduced in 1996: Date: December 13, 1996 Author: Deborah Robiglio Section: Page: Words: 626 LV riding into the future A proposed $ 2.2 billion transportation system would include a monorail and increased bus service. By Deborah Robiglio Review-Journal Map, color. PROPOSED MONORAIL ROUTE Details of a $ 2.2 billion plan to build an 18-mile elevated monorail encircling the Strip were revealed Thursday with the expectation that final approval for the project will come in January. The rail, which would link McCarran International Airport with a main trunk line northeast along Las Vegas... [the rest is paywalled] Bustter (talk) 04:12, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Las Vegas Monorail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:43, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Las Vegas Monorail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:18, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Las Vegas Monorail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:23, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge articles on the individual stations

[edit]

There are 8 separate articles for the individual stations of the monorail. I would propose to merge all of these articles to here. They consist almost entirely of information that violates "Wikipedia is not a travel guide": lists of nearby hotels and attractions, and instructions to get to the stations. What little encyclopedic information is in these articles could easily be presented in a table in this article. I don't think the individual stations meet WP:GNG - there are very few substantial reliable sources that discuss any one of the stations as a distinct topic. And the WP:STATION notability essay supports this idea, for example, "Where only basic information about related stations exist, considering presenting it as a table within a relevant article, rather than creating articles for each station." Toohool (talk) 18:15, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Useddenim (talk) 21:55, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move that content to Wikivoyage. If there's anything useful left, keep them. If there isn't, merge to an expanded list. I can see justfification for a sentence description on each, and a photo. Other than that, they're all pretty similar, were all opened together, and anything on the system is best handled in one place.
I'd keep Mandalay Bay though. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:14, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Why keep the Mandalay Bay station article? It seems to me that the proposed extension of the line to Mandalay Bay is relevant to the whole system, and whatever usable content there is on that topic should be in this article (and it already is, for the most part). Toohool (talk) 18:40, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alterations to all station articles have occured, with these eight edits in <2 minutes:

These eight have the duplicated edit summay "merged to Las Vegas Monorail", and replace the conents with "#REDIRECT [[Las Vegas Monorail]] Toohool, is there a plan for the merging to occur? —Sladen (talk) 23:31, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I merged all the content that's usable in my view. Is there some more content from the station articles that you think should be preserved? Toohool (talk) 23:35, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bankruptcy Sale 2020 Q4

[edit]
  • "Las Vegas Monorail Company files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection". KTNV. Sep 7, 2020. Retrieved 2020-12-23.
  • "Las Vegas Monorail sold to Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority". KTNV. Nov 27, 2020. Retrieved 2020-12-23.
  • "LVCVA deal complete for Las Vegas Monorail". KTNV. Dec 9, 2020. Retrieved 2020-12-23.

Conrad T. Pino (talk) 14:52, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't somewhere in the bankruptcy info be something about how the first bankruptcy effort was to take Chapter 9, only to have the courts rule that the monorail was private, not municipal, property and hence didn't qualify for Chapter 9?2600:1004:B140:7F52:C02E:836D:6A5F:707D (talk) 01:10, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Airport name

[edit]

I added back in the McCarran Field name to the airport under the Phase 2 discussion. In 2010 when the announcement was made, that was the airport's name. It was only just renamed in November 2021 so it's more correct to use the original name and then add "now Harry Reid International Airport" as I have done here. 23skidoo (talk) 22:15, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Las_Vegas_Monorail&oldid=1204032959"