Talk:Lancashire wrestling

Lancashire wrestling has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 29, 2024. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lancashire wrestling article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Martial arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Martial arts. Please use these guidelines and suggestions to help improve this article. If you think something is missing, please help us improve them!Martial artsWikipedia:WikiProject Martial artsTemplate:WikiProject Martial artsMartial arts articles

Professional wrestling

	Lancashire wrestling is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

England

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Lancashire and Cumbria

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Greater Manchester

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Lancashire wrestling and catch-as-catch-can are synonymous. Catch-as-catch-can wrestling is Lancashire wrestling. Therefore catch-as-catch-can was extant in Britain before it transferred to the United States. (see your entries for Lancashire wrestling and catch-as-catch-can wrestling).86.31.193.211 15:58, 1 January 2007 (UTC) Donald Black[reply]

Regarding capitalisation: Schwingen, the Swiss national sport, is an exception as ALL nouns in German are capitalised (have a capital initial) therefore Schwingen is ALWAYS written with a capital initial, as is Ranggeln, the Austrian folk style which you seem not to have heard about yet. 86.31.193.211 15:58, 1 January 2007 (UTC) Donald Black[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Please remember to tag redirects that you create per WP:REDCAT. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:51, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lancashire wrestling/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Spagooder (talk · contribs) 23:38, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: PearlyGigs (talk · contribs) 05:47, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Starting review

Hi, Spagooder, I'll review this. Hope to come back soon. Best wishes. PearlyGigs (talk) 05:47, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I look forward to it. Thanks. Spagooder (talk) 20:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know I've made a start by doing some tidying and I've provisionally classified it as a C, pending completion of review, as it certainly isn't a stub. By the way, I had to laugh when I read "theatrical professional wrestling" in the lead! I'm going to be busy in real life from now for the next couple of days but will hopefully be able to find time to complete the review over the weekend. PearlyGigs (talk) 12:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me. I had to specify "theatrical" because it had already been a professional sport for a long time beforehand. Spagooder (talk) 21:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria

Well written. The prose is fine and I just needed to do some basic copyediting on things like quote marks, spacing, and a couple of American spellings. There are no spelling, grammar, or syntax issues now and I can't see anything that is outside MOS guidelines. The lead could perhaps be expanded a bit, but I think it is satisfactory as a concise summary which provides a good introduction to a significant sporting history subject.
WP:V and WP:NOR. The reflist is good and the citations are presented in standard publishing format. No problems in this area and certainly no evidence of original research or copyright issues.
Breadth of coverage. Focus is within scope and coverage is adequate given that there is limited information in sources. I notice you mentioned the predictable lack of interest from Victorian newspapers.
Neutrality. No problems.
Stability. No problems.
Images. These are really good. It is true that pictures say a thousand words. All are PD and all are relevant, so no problems around using them here.

Hi again, Spagooder. I think this is an excellent piece of work on an interesting (indeed, fascinating) subject that is not well-known despite its historical significance. I am promoting the article to WP:GA. Very well done. PearlyGigs (talk) 11:13, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for taking the time to edit and review the article, I'm glad you enjoyed it. What would be your suggestions for expanding the lead? Spagooder (talk) 20:05, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I personally wouldn't expand it but, as it's a single paragraph, I was sort of playing devil's advocate a bit there because some people might say it's too short. I actually prefer a short introduction but the MOS here recommends a summary of the whole article which, in any event, I think you have accomplished. All the best. PearlyGigs (talk) 20:59, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]