Talk:Lahug Airport

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the airport project.

Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Military history: Aviation / Asian / North America / Southeast Asia / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Asian military history task force
	North American military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force
	United States military history task force

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by SL93 talk 00:53, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the Cebu IT Park was originally where Lahug Airport was?

Source: [1]

ALT1: ... that after former Philippine President Ramon Magsaysay's plane launched from Lahug Airport, he had a plane crash which ultimately ended his life? Source: [2]
Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Accessibility of transport in London

Created by TheNuggeteer (talk) and Mastodon554 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 5 past nominations.

TheNuggeteer (talk) 05:58, 26 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General eligibility:
New enough:
Long enough: - After copyediting, it does not meet the 1,500-character threshold.

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing: - Needs better sources to back claims.
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

Cited:
Interesting: - Neither hook is particularly interesting to a broad audience. The papal mass at the airport sounds far more interesting.

QPQ: - Still needed.
Overall: Went ahead and copyedited the article, but it seems to have brought it below the length requirement after removing some filler. Sounder Bruce 01:41, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SounderBruce: I reviewed a DYK nom for QPQ, and I fixed the longevity problem, for another alt, I suggest:
ALT2 ... that the first papal mass in Cebu was held at Lahug Airport? Source: [3]
Anyway, can you tell me which sources aren't reliable? TheNuggeteer (talk) 02:39, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"PacificWrecks.com" does not exactly scream "reliable". The CDN piece seems to be an opinion/contributor reflection rather than a proper news article. I imagine a papal mass would have plenty of coverage, no? Sounder Bruce 02:42, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheNuggeteer: Please respond to the above. Z1720 (talk) 01:50, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SounderBruce: PacificWrecks seems pretty popular and reliable, but in case, I found this website, which seems like a copy of a book? And the other statement about the CDN piece, yes, It seems like that, but they would not change the facts, since they are one of the most reliable sources in Cebu City. And the 3rd and last statement, yes, It feels like that, but it was pretty old, so im not sure about the last one.
Thanks, 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 04:28, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There still isn't sufficient citations; coverage of the papal mass from beyond the one author (Oaminal) would be ideal. Sounder Bruce 01:44, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SounderBruce:Found six citations, SunStar, Augnet, The Vatican, CDN (another), Inquirer, and a Reuters video (which stated that there were a million people, which probably can be included in the hook.) 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 07:18, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SounderBruce: Does the above satisfy your concerns? If not, what else needs to happen to get this approved? Z1720 (talk) 23:18, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New reviewer needed unless SounderBruce returns. Z1720 (talk) 19:54, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheNuggeteer: Those citations need to be added to the article (and could help expand it a bit more). Sounder Bruce 22:07, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, just needs checking. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 12:03, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SounderBruce: 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 09:16, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheNuggeteer: SounderBruce hasn't responded to this in over a week, so I'll take over from here. I took out one sentence per WP:SUMMARY, and was about to move the 1966 closure to the end of the paragraph beginning "On August", but the cited source doesn't mention the date. Could one be added?--Laun chba ller 12:24, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Launchballer: Done, Done, and Done, found a Pressreader source. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 12:20, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's better, although I just noticed a bunch of stuff in the infobox that isn't sourced. For DYK purposes you can just add cites to the infobox but I think the article would be better if it was added to the body.--Laun chba ller 12:38, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which parts? 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 12:39, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Airport codes, opening date, timezone, elevation, and the runway stuff. I think you can get away with just linking Bureau of Aeronautics to Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines.--Laun chba ller 12:46, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Launchballer, TheNuggeteer, SounderBruce, and Z1720: This is now the oldest unapproved nomination, and we are a few days away from WP:DYKTIMEOUT applying. Are there still any remaining unaddressed issues? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:54, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, the infobox stuff still needs sourcing, and pronto given it's been a week and a half.--Laun chba ller 04:50, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It has been over 10 days since Launchballer's last clarification, and the nominator didn't respond to the ping. With WP:DYKTIMEOUT applying in a few days and no edits to the article since the 10th, enough leeway has been given here. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 22:56, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]