Jump to content

Talk:Lagarostrobos

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Another link that might be of interest:

http://www.parks.tas.gov.au/veg/pines.html Native Conifers of Tasmania

"Although no single tree in this stand is of that age, the stand itself as a single organism has existed that long". The expression "the stand as a single organism" is apparently illogical, and http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagarostrobos_franklinii in fact claims that the roots are 10,500 years old, making these roots the oldest living organism. --Espoo 09:44, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed it is illogical; the thing is a clonal colony, not an individual. I would not expect any part of the root system to be that old (not even remotely that old); exactly the same point applies as it does to the above-ground stems. If the :de page is making the claim it is that old, it should be removed - MPF 23:54, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the species page titled only for the genus?

[edit]

Should not the title of the page be Lagarostrobos franklinii? As it is, searching for the species L. franklinii redirects to the Lagarostrobos (genus) page, but this should be the other way around. The genus Lagarostrobos is currently monotypic (L. franklinii is the only species in it), but this need not always remain so, and the species L. franklinii has already been known previosuly as Dacrydium and may again change genus in the future. MFdeS (talk) 00:45, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Given the lack of comment I assume there's no objection. I'll rename the page. MFdeS (talk) 03:39, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
WP:FLORA suggests that monotypic genera should be at the genus name title, and this convention is widely followed. If circumscription changes, a separate article on L. franklinii can be split out. Plantdrew (talk) 23:18, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lagarostrobos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:34, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lagarostrobos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:18, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lagarostrobos&oldid=1203457335"