Talk:Lady Dimitrescu/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Kung Fu Man (talk · contribs) 23:55, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a. (reference section):
- The article has a proper References section. --Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- b. (citations to reliable sources):
- All sources cited are recognized as either reliable sources or situational sources cited in the appropriate manner.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- c. (OR):
- Spotcheck was performed, no original research was done or statements not supported by the checked sources. Specific sources include [13] and [14], which draw comparison between the character and previous series antagonists Mr. X and the Baker family in terms of approach, source [6] does discuss her design history in the details cited, and sources [55], [56] and [57] do discuss her reception in the matter cited with no OR performed based off their statements.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
- No copyright violations done. The majority of the article is original writing and quotes applied as needed.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- a. (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a. (major aspects):
- b. (focused):
- a. (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/fail:
- Pass/fail:
(Criteria marked are unassessed)
All issues addressed on User:GlatorNator's talk page, really only minor ones at all to bring up. Overall a very entertaining and thorough read!--Kung Fu Man (talk) 23:55, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- Arigato gozaimasu for the review :). GlatorNator (ᴛ) 23:57, 10 May 2023 (UTC)