Jump to content

Talk:Lacock Abbey

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Lacock Abbey/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: I'll take this one on. Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 05:53, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]

This is an informative, well-structured and well-referenced article that will need few adjustments to reach GA standard. I therefore have only a few small comments to make.

  • Suggest linking Roundhead and Cavalier for Parliamentary and Royalist sides in the civil war, too, for non-Brits.
  • It might be worth noting in the lead image caption that the window that Fox Talbot photographed is above the door.
  • You might like to link some architectural terms in the text, such as cloister, balustrade, parapet, belvedere.
  • Consider linking period terms like Medieval and Tudor.
  • Mousetrap camera might need a gloss or wikilink.
  • The balance between Harry Potter and all the other films looks slightly wrong. Perhaps the section should consist of a single paragraph, with a little more detail on the other films. For example, you might like to name and link Philippa Gregory, who wrote The Other Boleyn Girl, and the directors of the named films. Jane Austen and Hilary Mantel might also be mentioned.
  • "During four days in October" and "the sixth" perhaps constitute overmuch detail.
  • The Half-Blood Prince sentence could be better phrased: it might begin "Some scenes in Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince were filmed ..."
  • Moll Flanders should be linked. You might like to name and link its author, Daniel Defoe, and give the book's date, 1772 also.

That's about it. Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:33, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking on this review. I have added a lot of wikilinks, including the ones you mentioned above, and have generally acted on your suggestions. The main exception is the authorlink for William Lisle Bowles, because I did not know what was required and how to go about it. Perhaps you could demonstrate! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:39, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A pleasure to review it. As everything is now in order, I'm happy to award it GA status. Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:16, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:42, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lacock Abbey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:57, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]