Talk:Lac du Bois (camp)

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 March 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Minnesota Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dab page required

This article should be merged with the language program and this page turned into a dab page. Lac du Bois is a common name (with many variations) in the US and Canada. --Stormbay (talk) 16:24, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this, but I think all the camps would need to be moved if a consensus to do so is found. TravellingCari 16:36, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree as well. Waldsee is Waldsee (camp); we could follow a similar pattern for the rest of the camps. Does three make a consensus? Elatb (talk) 14:51, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would say that it is a consensus. Go for it! --Stormbay (talk) 21:22, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]