Jump to content

Talk:Labour government, 1964–1970

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I could be wrong, but I worked for the Parliamentary Labour Party from the middle of the Profumo crisis until the spring of 1967. I recall everyone listed in the the Wilson governments covered here, except one name. David John Mauerman. I think this must be a misprint, but who on earth for escapes me. I don't have access to the Votes of the time, nor, just now, to the right Hansards, but I hope someone else might.Delahays (talk) 21:26, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in First Wilson ministry

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of First Wilson ministry's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "ReferenceC":

  • From Second MacDonald ministry: The People’s Party: the History of the Labour Party by Tony Wright and Matt Carter
  • From Harold Wilson: Labour's First Century by Duncan Tanner, Pat Thane, and Nick Tiratsoo
  • From First MacDonald ministry: Labour’s Great Record: An Outline of the First Six Months’ Work of the Labour Government, by Labour Publications Department, 3 Eccleston Square, London, S.W.I
  • From Clement Attlee: Labour in Power, 1945–51 by Kenneth Morgan
  • From Charles de Gaulle: Perry, K. (1976) Modern European History, WH Allen, ISBN 0750604824

Reference named "A History Of The British Labour Party":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:13, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Defence policy

[edit]

I've read elsewhere in Wikipedia that "the Wilson Government decided on significant reductions in the defence budget, with defence being the primary target of the government's efforts to reduce public spending due to wider economic problems". Being this the case, shouldn't this article include a section focused on Wilson's defence policy? Regards, DPdH (talk) 10:46, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on First Wilson ministry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:05, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Labour government, 1964–1970. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:02, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Education section

[edit]

The section is a bit of a mess. It fails adequately to distinguish between England and Wales on the one hand, and Scotland on the other. The Education (School Milk) Act 1970 is touted as an expansion of free school milk, whereas in fact it was necessitated by Labour's ending of free school milk for secondary pupils (some schools were designated as secondaries but had younger pupils). It also needs better linking. DuncanHill (talk) 20:49, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just a little bothered by the impression this creates that nothing much happened to disturb the impression of orderly, consensual post-Butskellite UK government, especially in Scotland or Wales, not to mention Ulster. Not a mention of the Highlands and Islands Development board, or the emergence of Scottish nationalism - though Willie Ross was a major influence in the complexion of the first Wilson government. Or the loss of Labour control of Glasgow City Council in the late sixties Not a mention of the racism in the 1964 Smethwick camapaign, which Wilson himself attacked in his first Commons speech as Prime Minister, and also brought an end to the career of Patrick Gordon Walker - his choice as Foreign Secretary. Or the first appearance at Westminster of an Irish Republican Labour MP, Gerry Fitt. The devolution of the 1990s had deep, and tangled roots. and the white heat of the technological revolution was blazing simultaneously with a nationalisation of iron and steel. 90.192.200.27 (talk) 22:04, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 31 October 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus - The nominator probably needed to describe in more detail why their proposed move was needed. As it is, given minimal discussion, no need to relist. FOARP (talk) 09:29, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Labour government, 1964–1970 → Labour government (1964–1970) – Per WP:NCDURATION. Originally I had thought Wilson ministries would be the better title here, hence why this is separate from Talk:Labour government, 1974–1979#Requested move 31 October 2024, but that article also covers the third and fourth Wilson ministries. estar8806 (talk) ★ 03:13, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Labour_government,_1964–1970&oldid=1256521023"