Talk:LG/Archives/2012

LG/Goldstar/Kambrook

Fascinating to know that the old Goldstar brand is now LG. Here in Australia, Goldstar was launched in the 1980s as the electronics arm of Kambrook, who were best known for electric kettles and other kitchenwares. Goldstar electronics were notorious for breaking down. So does this mean there is actually a link between Kambrook and LG? Bricks J. Winzer 13:31, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Goldstar in U.S.A/ Canada

The Goldstar product name seemed to pop out of no where in Canada in the early 90's?. They branded(manufactured?) major appliances and mostly microwaves. Their products had that "cheap" look to them, and while prices were lover they did not compare or COULD NOT compete with established American brands. They were known for being cheap in that bad way and were notorious for breaking down as stated above, and not lasting very long. People only bough Gold star branded products only if they really had to and couldn't afford better. The brand disappeared sometime in the mid 90's and the LG electronic and computer stuff appeared in the late 90's. LG appliances seemed to appear the same time as the electronics or a few years later. MOST PEOPLE DON'T KNOW THAT GOLDSTAR IS ACTUALLY LG AND IS THE SAME COMPANY —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.10.138.233 (talk) 16:46, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Goldstar, Middle East

A citation was and is still needed. I didn't find any Goldstar electronics, but after some googling I found Goldstar beer, apparently from Israel, because it has Hebrew characters on it. [1] --Evilboy 17:19, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Goldstar logo.gif

Image:Goldstar logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Company Slogan

How come the company slogan isn't showing in the info box? This should be fixed. --71.225.111.4 (talk) 15:56, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

old slogan

I seem to remember "digitally yours" being one of LG's old slogans. Might want to research/add it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.50.73.153 (talk) 04:22, 5 February 2009 (UTC) the new slogan for LG is "Life's Good" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.237.244.234 (talk) 06:53, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

It's too bad the article couldn't state the real reason LG was changed to "Life's Good." Most people in the English speaking world were laughing uncontrollably at the name "Lucky Goldstar."Landroo (talk) 07:59, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Intro Reads Like an Advertisement

The introductory paragraph is BS. It reads as is an employee of LG wrote it or as if someone copied it from LG's website. The second half of it doesn't even really tell you anything. FuzzyCuteness (talk) 00:46, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Misplaced fine information

The information in the "Controversy" section is about LG Display, which already has an apparently indentical entry citing a primary source. It's not needed here unless there's a reliable source faulting LG Corp itself in the matter. - BilCat (talk) 09:49, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. That's what i said.660gd4qo (talk) 10:03, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

File:LG Logo.svg Nominated for Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:LG Logo.svg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011 What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:00, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

• See discussion. --Lexein (talk) 17:38, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Company stock

In the History section (which reads like a timeline and not really prose), it mentions the stock being split into 4 parts but mentions 3. Am I missing something here? Cleanelephant (talk) 06:27, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

I've removed the sentence about the company stocks. As a public company, LG Corp is required to publish its financial information publicly, including the names of major shareholders, which is available from its website [2]. The breakdown of shares is listed on page 11 of the 2010 auditor's report; as of 31 December 2010 the Koo family (romanized in the report as "Ku") including Kim Young Shik (wife of CEO Koo Bon-Moo) owns 45.25% of the shares. The CEO himself holds 10.51%, which makes the statement about him holding 52% false. Given that major shareholders' information are publicly available, an obscure female "next generation CEO" holding 26% of the shares seems to be extremely unlikely if not impossible. Adding on to that, a quick Google search would reveal that the likely successor is Koo Kwang-Mo, Koo Bon-Neung's son who is adopted by Koo Bon-Moo, and that none of the Koo daughters are involved in the family business [3]. --Joshua ^{Say "hi" to me!}_{What I've done?} 12:03, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Kodak divisions and patents buyout

Just thought I'd park this here to notify people, so in case the deal goes legit (as seems to be decided pretty soon) it can be put into the article. The whole hubbub is about the fact that today, Kodak has announced selling off its film divisions: http://www.bjp-online.com/british-journal-of-photography/news/2200811/kodak-to-sell-off-film-division , and LG is one out of the four companies making a joint bid: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444233104577593681054808606.html Gee, I wonder if any of the seven currently available Super8 Kodak stocks will soon bear the LG logo... --79.193.39.165 (talk) 18:49, 24 August 2012 (UTC)