Jump to content

Talk:LAW 80

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Spotting rifle

[edit]

"Upon firing, the .22 cartridge case sets back out of the 7.62 mm casing", I cannot understand this statement. Can someone expand on it? What is "sets back out" mean? Maury 12:21, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than me trying to explain it, look at this link [1] - the spotting rifle from the LAW 80 was used on the SMAW. I've never seen this system used before, would be nice to get some non-copyright pictures for the article. Riddley 00:00, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have reworded the sentance slightly to try to clarify the action. Hopefully this is an improvement? --Mlongcake 11:49, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

[edit]

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 13:12, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photos

[edit]

The article doesn't has any photos of this anti-tank weapon.These sites: [[2]] and [[3]] have photos of this weapon.Agre22 (talk) 21:40, 19 August 2008 (UTC)agre22[reply]

"LAW 94"

[edit]

The LAW 80 was most certainly renamed the "LAW94" as part of later number designation for AT weapons possibly because of a protracted development period. The 84mm Carl Gustav remained in service until the 90's alongside the MILAN, the LAW80 took quite some time to replace it on general issue.

Training posters and manuals refer to it as such. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.7.92.34 (talk) 05:44, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LAW 80. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:16, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LAW 80. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:00, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]