Talk:Lê Hiển Tông

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Vietnam

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian (talk) 15:30, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

– revert undiscussed move (misuse of db6 housekeeping template), also per English sources, Lê Dynasty, and recent RfC majority. The two kings Lê Hiến Tông (黎憲宗 1461–1504) and Lê Hiển Tông (黎顯宗 1717–1786) are distinguished by different middle character and pronunciation, the current basic-ASCII title is occupied by the less notable of the two. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:46, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support Per WP:UE. English Wikipedia should use real English, and not some idealized version that completely lacks the vocabulary and orthography necessary to discuss topics like this. For the record, I came across this RM because User talk:Salvio giuliano has been on my watchlist for the last week or so. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 10:54, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support more accurate transcription. bobrayner (talk) 18:50, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support both moves per nom. There are some sources that can't type diacritics or have style manuals that prohibit diacritics. Wikipedia does not and, for those readers alarmed by unusual typography, the diacritics can be "read through". i.e., those unfamiliar with them can ignore the tildes et al. Wikipedia is an online, Unicode-based reference work that need not reflect archaic typographical limitations especially here where disambiguation is needed. — AjaxSmack 03:15, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.