Talk:Kylchap
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: no consensus. Jenks24 (talk) 07:11, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Kylchap → Kylchap exhaust – Request made 22 August 2012 by user:Globbet using template:movenotice. Reason given "The device in question is not commonly known as a Kylchap" -- PBS (talk) 18:46, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Would Kylchap exhaust not be better? The device in question is not commonly known as a Kylchap.
- I'd have thought ejector more than exhaust. I'd be happy to leave it though. They're called "Kylchap" when discussed in context with the other designs, and that's just about the only time this rather obscure term ever gets used. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:20, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.