Talk:Kristen DiMera

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.
It was contested by Casanova88 (talk · contribs) with the comment:
Added reasoning in opposition for deletion...will edit later. Articles must never have PROD or deletion tags placed again.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Soap Operas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Requested move 2013

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus. (non-admin closure) Red Slash 01:44, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kristen Blake → Kristen DiMera – This is her legal name. On the show Days of our Lives, which she is a major character, she is always referred to as Kristen DiMera and never ever as Kristen Blake. So I don't understand why the article would be named Kristen Blake. It doesn't make any sense. DendroNaja (talk) 17:45, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per WP:COMMONNAME, she is known as "Kristen Blake", so the page should stay as it is. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 17:47, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

She is never referred to as "Kristen Blake" on the show. She used to be back in the 1990's, but never ever now. She is always referred to as "Kristen DiMera". Kristen DiMera is her LEGAL NAME, not Kristen Blake. --DendroNaja (talk) 18:23, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but per WP:COMMONNAME it's Kristen Blake. Being back on a show for a year doesn't cancel out your commonname. Legal names also don't cancel out WP:COMMONNAME, nor do how you're referenced. Not how it works on Wikipedia. Maybe on other Wiki sites, but not here. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 18:35, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To further prove a point, more results pop for for Kristen Blake than do for Kristen DiMera. Which automatically cancels out the hope of changing the page. Published materials further compliment "Kristen Blake" as the character's common name. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 18:43, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but that is proves very little. The point is she is referred to as Kristen DiMera, NOT as Kristen Blake. Her legal name is Kristen DiMera and fans across the board know her and refer to her as Kristen DiMera. The article even begins with her being referred to as "Kristen DiMera". I believe your opposition to the name change is unjustified, unfair and plain wrong. --DendroNaja (talk) 19:32, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but it proves A LOT. You're ignoring Wiki policy, which is in place for a reason. Per the policy, her common name is Kristen Blake, which published materials support. And just because fans know her as Kristen DiMera does not even mean that's her common name. And the article starts as DiMera because that is her name now, but per Wiki policy, the ARTICLE must stay at the character's common name. My opposition is not unjustified, nor is it plain wrong. You are wrong, not proving your point, except going against the policies put in place to prevent fans from making pages fan dictated. Please stop ignoring the facts presented, which you have failed to present yourself. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 19:41, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. She's a fictional character. How can she possibly have a "legal name"? -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:35, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Soaps usually have characters go by different names, given their families and marriages, etc. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 22:11, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Blake vs. DiMera

Kristen hasn't gone by Blake since she married Tony in the 1990s. Her common name is DiMera which the character has been using since that time and the show itself refers to her as. The name Blake hasn't even been mentioned in years and years and years.Cebr1979 (talk) 21:52, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 2014

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 13:37, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kristen Blake → Kristen DiMera – It is of great debut of whether or not Kristen's commonname is Blake or DiMera. And considering it is of different times than it was when the first request move was made, I am re-opening for editors alike to discuss whether or not the page should be moved, once again. Below, say whether you support the change and why, or whether you oppose the change and why. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 19:13, 28 July 2014 (UTC) I hardly think two editors telling you facts about why a name that hasn't been used in almost two full decades is not a common name is of "great debut" (especially since that makes no sense, the word you're looking for is "debate") but, here goes anyhow: Yes, I think the page should be moved to "Kristen Dimera." As for why, well, I've already said that. So has the other editor.Cebr1979 (talk) 23:29, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Cebr1979: To me, your message to Livelikemusic sounded rude and disrespectful. You should of just left with your opppose or support and the why. But if I misunderstood, please forgive me. :@Livelikemusic: Yes, I support the move, because almost no where would you find the name ″Kristen Blake″, meaning not articles, forums, websites etc.... It all refers to ″Kristen DiMera″. — SoapFan12 (talk, contribs) 11:37, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mild support - I can't believe that the press prefer to use this name nowadays. Well, this character reluctantly decides to work for her daddy again, whom she despises. I was going to oppose until I used Google News. --George Ho (talk) 02:10, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

I support it, although her common name was still Blake during those times. *Now* it may be DiMera... (Why was this move done without consulting me again?) Yoryla (talk) 00:45, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Kristen DiMera. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:38, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Kristen DiMera. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:09, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Marriage" to Tony DiMera

At this point, Kristen's marriage to Tony has been revealed to be a sham, and that she wasn't posing as Nicole Walker; now that Nicole is back in-town, the marriage is completely invalidated, as it was never Nicole that married Tony, as it was "legally" bound. Unfortunately, it is likely that the soap won't address the continued state of the "marriage," which could mean it continues on forever, when in fact, it will not in a legal matter; the marriage was never valid to begin with. livelikemusic talk! 13:21, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]