Talk:Kohn Pedersen Fox

The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Danielcurran1142 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
208.87.234.201 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
154halfpastnine (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
208.255.106.10 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
A874b3j (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
14graz44 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
1555hryaw (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

My concerns - there are no sources listed. No external articles from anywhere else supporting the statements in the article. PEsays (talk) 4:44, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

article change.

I reverted that a little hastily, but if you want to change the article at least keep the references to their major projects. And try to tone down the cheerleading. Jasongetsdown 19:02, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

will try and wikify and create some good structure out of the one piece drabble.--Visik 08:08, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kohn Pedersen Fox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100320004036/http://www.kpf.com/ to http://www.kpf.com/.
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110930161202/http://www.related.com/destinations/HudsonYards/ to http://www.related.com/destinations/HudsonYards/.

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:50, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No history?

A first section called "Recent work" is highly unusual. Syced (talk) 07:09, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree this could be seen as promotional formatting. I am going to switch the section so History shows up first. Please discuss here if you think this is an ill advised change. PubHobbyst (talk) 15:25, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive Images of Buildings

Is it okay for this page to have this many images? I understand they're an architecture firm, but this almost seems excessive. I have not come across many architecture Wikipedia pages so maybe I'm just not aware of the norm on a page like this. PubHobbyst (talk) 15:23, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]