Talk:Kohail murder case

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Canada High‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Saudi Arabia Low‑importance

	Saudi Arabia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saudi Arabia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Saudi Arabia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Saudi ArabiaWikipedia:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaTemplate:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaSaudi Arabia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

removed

I have removed the complaint that it is "stating an opinion in a judicial opinion" for the court to suggest that the Kohails should have broken off the fight. In fact, in the law of most jurisdictions with which I am familiar, self-defense is only available as a defense if the defendant could not retreat or was in a special situation in which he had no duty to retreat (such as being in his own home). Unless Saudi law is different in not containing a duty to retreat in a public place, the "opinion" expressed by the court is not a personal opinion but an expression of the law.Bill (talk) 06:12, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

removed "facts" section as it is unsourced

If any of this information can be sourced then it can be allowed back into the article. -- Esemono (talk) 14:43, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

== Facts ==
This is the verdict announcing Kohail's Sentence together with Muhanna Massoud.

There are 5 important points to notice:

[[Image:Mohamed Kohail Verdict.jpg|200px|right|thumb|Mohamed Kohail's Verdict]]
(Red): The Verdict refers back to the confession of Mohamed Kohail and Muhanna Masoud. This confession was taken under the torture of the Saudi Police. Sultan suffered from a broken leg in custody. Moreover, Muhammad Kohail was mislead by the police telling him if he signed he did punch Monzer in the stomach then he will be let free. Muhamed signs the document, and after that he was told Monzer Passed away. When Mohamed was identifying the person he punshed he pointed at Moneer Haraki not Munzer. But the video clearly shows that Moneer was not fighting at all and many witnesses including the school principal said that Mohammed, Sultan and Muhanna were beating Munzer.

Yellow): The statement says: "witnesses agreed unanimously on the beating however disagreed on the tool used". Two points we have to mention:
a) The witnesses referred to in the statement were the prosecutor's witnesses.
b) Those witnesses do not carry the same version of the story as said in the verdict. This is considered by law a solid ground for a reasonable doubt in such a case.

(Blue): Statement clearly says that the reason behind death is the internal bleeding in the bottom of the stomach complicated with the sickness of the heart. This statement is sufficient to change the entire case from a first degree murder case into a manslaughter case. This denies all what has been said about internal bleeding in the brain or anything else.

(light green): Kohail and Muhanna have 30 days to appeal.

BLP1E

This article is a classic case of WP:BLP1E (An article bio who is notable for only one thing) so I'm suggesting moving the article to a new title about the event. The article is already both brothers so I think something like, Kohail Brother Trial or Kohail Trial, Kohail Brother murder case, etc, etc. Anyone have any other ideas? -- Esemono (talk) 13:17, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

concerning the comment on violating the "International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights": Saudi Arabia has neither signed nor ratified that treaty, and hence would not breach it. I suggest to remove this part. If one wants to list more treaties that might be violated, candidates would be the Convention against Torture, in case torture allegations during detention are true. Another mention could be the UN resolution "Safeguards guaranteeing protection of the rights of those facing the death penalty", but this only has recommending character, cf. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_resolution . To find good wording for these two needs some attention, and would probably be too long for staying in the introduction.Daspostloch (talk) 22:19, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Amnesty Urgent Actions

Due to the reopening of the case, a second UA has been created and is currently running. Could someone who knows how to do this footnote thingy modify the respective section and add a link to http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/MDE23/007/2010/en ? Thanks. Daspostloch (talk) 22:10, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Kohail murder case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:33, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of clarity

This article is very confusing. We have the brothers arriving in Canada in 2000, then there is a fight in an unspecified location, in 2007, then they are on trial in Saudi Arabia. Then they are released in Saudi Arabia, but apparently don't go anywhere.

Please can someone familiar with the sources remedy this? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:35, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]