Talk:Knox Supergroup
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merger discussion
[edit]I propose merging to the "Knox Dolomite" to the "Knox Supergroup"~~ for the following reasons. 1) "Knox Dolomite" is part of the Knox Supergroup and is not even the proper nomenclature for the rock unit being described. 2) The body of this article was a copy and paste from another article by the same author, this is evident because it is describing the "Kerbal Formation" formation not the "Knox Dolomite" 3) There are no valid references for this article. Zigismon (talk) 20:16, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree, 1) that same rational could be extended to virtually any formation article that is part of a group 2) that could and has been easily be fixed 3) the same could be said for all formation articles that almost solely rely on fossilworks/palaeodb (often broken or outdated). Lavalizard101 (talk) 10:53, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Merge no valid references for this article. Allan Nonymous (talk) 20:51, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Merge would be the ideal result. Doesn't need a duplicate article with virutally no content. scope_creepTalk 14:17, 3 September 2024 (UTC)