This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
This really needs a total rewrite to make it encyclopedic and non-PR. A good first step would be to cut it back to who he is and what he has done, removing all his thoughts on life, the universe and everything. The references are a classic case of WP:Bombardment and a good many of the non-independent ones could go, too. JohnCD (talk) 23:22, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The background and education part doesn't explain how somebody of prime draft age could drop out of a master's program and not end up conscripted and in Vietnam. Perhaps he got a safe lottery number, but this was THE big issue for a healthy male. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.49.20.187 (talk) 00:49, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This article really is bollocks. Especially this passage: "favoring individual responsibility, private philanthropy, a limited U.S. foreign policy, and minimal government intrusion in private personal interactions". In a recent article, Kiplinger proposed that every employer be required to have a 401K plan and that all employees be required to contribute 3% of their salary to the fund, with an equivalent 3% match from the employer, increasing to 6% from both as time passes. A philosophy far, far away from Libertarianism as you can possibly get. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.250.181.130 (talk • contribs) 16:16, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
