Jump to content

Talk:King & Queen/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: James086 (talk · contribs) 22:42, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • The second sentence in the lead section is hard to read. So as to group the artists together, instead of saying Redding→Thomas→Redding, perhaps it should read: "It is Thomas's fourth album and Thomas's sixth and the final studio album released before his death on December 10, 1967."
  • Ref 3 (BBC review) doesn't say anything about Redding co-writing "Ooh Carla, Ooh Otis". Also, who else wrote it?
  • In the release section, I think it should say "eight on the R&B chart and number thirty on the Pop charts Hot 100". Bold to indicated added text.
  • In the Charts section under Album it says "Pop chart" but shouldn't it be "Top LPs" as per the chart's name at the time? The same applies to the "R&B chart" should be "Hot R&B LPs" or even "Top Black Albums", also the link should probably point to Top R&B/Hip-Hop Albums.
  • For the Singles "R&B chart" should be "Hot Rhythm & Blues Singles" and "Pop chart" should be "Billboard Hot 100".
  • Could the release and the reception sections be combined into one "Release and reception"?
  • "King & Queen received generally positive acclaim..." - You can't receive negative acclaim, perhaps "King & Queen was generally positively received.."

I look forward to seeing these addressed. James086Talk 22:42, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One last thing I just noticed, the second last sentence of "Background and Recording" begins with the word "It", I assume this means the album? Just a little unclear if it refers to the album or just one song. Perhaps it could say it which tracks feature which artists. Good work, I've passed it as I think it meets the criteria anyway. James086Talk 20:46, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]