Talk:Kim Richards

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

New York (state) Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Television: Reality

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Reality television task force.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

A note about sources

At the moment, all facts in this article are sourced to (though not necessarily drawn from) the subject's entry at imdb.com. Rather than footnote each sentence, one note has been inserted at the end of each paragraph. As the article expands, please try to adjust the references as appropriate. Thanks and happy editing! Butseriouslyfolks 07:00, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You forgot to mention she was on James at 16 in 1978

I just watched "Race to Witch Mountain" and Kim Richards' character is credited as "Tina" not Tia, as it is in the first Witch Mountain saga. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.149.220.108 (talk) 22:20, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tia was corrected to Tina =

Done. Eruditess (talk) 17:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Passive voice parody

A recent Language Log post by Geoffrey K. Pullum analyzes a spoof rewriting of this article by Matt Cherett on Buzzfeed.

Rewriting Wikipedia in the passive?

Keahapana (talk) 04:15, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Heading Picture

Can someone give Kim a heading picture? I don't know how to & think it should be an up-to-date one. Maybe something like: 1

or 2 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.200.222.160 (talk) 16:50, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent picture

Can someone please add a recent picture?Zigzig20s (talk) 21:54, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agree . Eruditess (talk) 20:47, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Zigzig20s and Eruditess: Does anyone have one ? - FlightTime (open channel) 22:30, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@FlightTime, I don't think it's just as plain and simple as having one. Wikipedia has certain rules for posting pictures of people. Mainly due to copyright. So if we can find a recent photo of kim that is fair/free use or no copyright, then we can use it. Or I think if we get permission from somebody who owns the copyright. Might be worth looking into Wiki-photo policy. I am just going off what I remember from the top of my head. Eruditess (talk) 23:08, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Eruditess: I'm a file move and ex-OTRS agent, I know the guidelines, I was just asking a question, in a simple maner. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 23:44, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Appearance on Dr. Phil

Her appearing on Dr. Phil is not notable — it is simply someone on a current TV show doing a confessional promotional appearance. If she said anything noteworthy in that appearance, then we add that and simply cite that it came from an episode of Dr. Phil. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:42, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And incidentally, Dr. Phil is not "a major network show." It's just a syndicated program. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:46, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked an anonymous editor for edit warring, but for the record, I would myself consider People to be a reliable source. Whether or not the content is appropriate for the article is clearly up for debate, however. — MusikAnimal ^talk 21:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the Time Inc. publication People is a reliable source. I did not contest the reasoning of the editor who removed the content since we at least both agreed that the content was simply a standard, non-notable talk-show appearance. --Tenebrae (talk) 00:48, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]