Talk:Kiddicraft

Toys Low‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Toys, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of toys on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ToysWikipedia:WikiProject ToysTemplate:WikiProject ToysToys articles

Low

This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Toys To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Barbie Queen of the Prom, Eve The Second Genesis CCG, More...
Assess : Rate the Unassessed Toys articles and Unknown-importance Toys articles.
Expand : Expand the doll pages, Expand Larami article
Infobox : Toys articles needing infoboxes
Photo : Request images that are needed from Wikipedia requested photographs of toys to included in each articles.
Stubs : work on stubs in Category:Toy stubs
Other : * Tag the talk pages of Toys-related articles with the {{WikiProject Toys}} banner.
- Help out with articles placed in Category:Toys articles needing attention

Tyco

(Luna Kid (talk) 10:00, 6 March 2011 (UTC)) WTF is "Tyco" (unreferenced, should be at least a link!) in the ~3rd paragraph?[reply]

Untitled

see http://news.lugnet.com/general/?n=54084

I have asked the author to consider helping make this article better. If he declines... The material in that posting appears to be well sourced (references are given at the bottom) and the sources could be tracked down and used to improve this article although the text in that case should not be used. ++Lar: t/c 00:46, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It seems surprising to me that a patent was ever granted, considering that bricks virtually identical to Lego were being sold in the UK by Minibrix (I played with these at school in 1953). It might be good to clarify in which countries patents were filed and what the law is regarding prior art. I would have thought that the Minibrix (still available on e-bay!) would serve to nullify any patents held by Lego, even now. Do they in fact still hold patents? I note that in the UK compatible bricks are sold cheaply by other manufacturers, perhaps because of this weakness. --Lindosland (talk) 20:46, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a photo of a "Kiddicraft" brick (white) with some modern Lego bricks (grey), for comparison: ErkDemon (talk) 21:33, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.brightontoymuseum.co.uk/wiki/File:Kiddicraft_and_Lego_bricks.jpg

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

I assume "Lego eventually required the rights to Kiddiecraft" should read "Lego eventually acquired the rights to Kiddicraft". –Screwtop (talk) 02:55, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Although they also realized that they required it... 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 23:28, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps redirect/merge

The section at Hilary Fisher Page#Kiddicraft largely contains the same content here. I think we're better off de-duplicating, and I think we can simply redirect this page to there. Alsee (talk) 20:23, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To avoid a split discussion, please comment at Talk:Hilary Fisher Page#Perhaps merge Kiddicraft. Alsee (talk) 20:31, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]