Talk:Kharnang Monastery

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tibet Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

China: History Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Chinese history (assessed as Low-importance).

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cross-check location

If I look at the coodinates and on a map I'd say the monastery is located in Baima County, Golog Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Qinghai - not in Sichuan ... ;) --katpatuka (talk) 18:26, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally one can find other Kharnang monasteries when searching Kharnang under http://places.thlib.org/ - so please re-check coordinates given. --katpatuka (talk) 17:01, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kharnang Monastery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101127062743/http://dharmaling.org/en/recognition-documents to http://www.dharmaling.org/en/recognition-documents

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:42, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

www.TibetanLama.com link query

The above link is given apparently in support of the recognition of Ronan Chatellier as a trulku of a lama of this monastery (reference no. 6 at the moment) but having gone through the entire menu on the link I could not locate any material relevant to the preceding text in the article. Unless someone can indicate its relevance I propose it should be deleted. --MacPraughan (talk) 08:09, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]