Talk:Khachatur Abovian/GA1

GA Review

I can tell this article was carefully put together. It is certainly acceptable as a Good Article. If you consider trying Feature Articles, please solicit a copyedit beforehand. --maclean 19:27, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
1. Well written. I made a few copyedit changes, mostly removing excess words or adding commas. Two sentences stuck out though:

"was transferred to the same post in Yerevan where he also encountered apathy and antagonism.[13]" - unclear what 'post' is referring to, and where did the 'apathy and antagonism' come from?

"which had a strong influence wide layers of Armenian society" - unclear wording

2. Factually accurate and verifiable - references look good and properly used via inline citations.
3. Broad in its coverage - covers major aspects of his life and works.
4. Neutral - yes.
5. Stable - yes.
6. Illustrated appropriately - all images are relevant and properly licensed.

Thank you for the prompt review. I addressed the issues you raised within the prose.-- Ευπάτωρ ^Talk!! 20:19, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]