Jump to content

Talk:Khaboris Codex

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Quote from the "Introduction to the Khabouris Codex Transcription": "Carbon dating has found this copy of the New Testament to be approximately 1,000 years old." Why then in the main article writes "It has been carbon-dated to the first decade of the 4th century"? also the introduction beggin with "The Khaburis Manuscript is a copy of a second century New Testament, which was written in approximately 165 AD (internally documented as 100 years after the great persecution of the Christians by Nero, in 65AD)." See: http://www.dukhrana.com/khabouris/files/001%20Introduction.doc --FlorinCB (talk) 07:10, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Its supposedly old date and colophon reading (in truth the colophon is illegible and no transcription has ever been published) are simply persistent fibs that have circulated around the internet. I have removed them from the article. אמר Steve Caruso 21:16, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Khaboris Codex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:10, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]