Talk:Khải Định

	LGBTQ portal This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
	This article is supported by the LGBTQ+ Person task force.

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Vietnam Low‑importance

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

doesn't sound all that neutral ... "In a manner fitting for a traitor, that is cowardly," etc.

Unfortunately many of these articles seem to have been devastated by Vietnamese monarchists (or maybe just one) with an agenda to make the royals look as good as possible and the communists as bad as possible. Everyking 03:49, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Rumors

There have been rumors that Bao Dai wasn't his child at all, but an adopted child. Khai Dinh was rumored to be either impotent or homosexual, as he wore flamboyant clothes, preferred to be in the company of men more than women, and when he watches hat tuong, he made the men take the role of women. DHN (talk) 02:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

啟定 or 啓定 ?

On the coins it was 啓定

Pyvanet (talk) 00:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Minh Mang which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:01, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Khải Định. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041022204738/http://www.vietscape.com/travel/hue/khaidinh.html to http://www.vietscape.com/travel/hue/khaidinh.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:26, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Better/ more sources for LGBT categories etc

Given he's listed under three LGBT categories, and the only given source is a (now-dead but viewable archived) news site of unclear quality, shouldn't there be more added? Per the evident facts, he was married, and had a son who succeeded him. There must be books, scholarly research, etc, regarding whether or not he was homosexual, surely? If so, they want including, if not, maybe the categorization is precipitate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.109.200.175 (talk) 01:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]