Talk:Keyless Go

Keyless Go article was marked for deletion

Sorry, but the Keyless Go article shouldn't deleted. It isn't an advertising space for Daimler-Chrysler, Siemens or any other company. Nor Keyless Go it is a neologism, because in every automotive development department a Keyless Go system is named KEYLESS GO! However, during the following days (and maybe weeks) I will put into the article some technical details. --Techie2 13:05, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still a little concerned about the real difference between Keyless go, and an advanced key, I'll keep my eye on it though... If Keyless Go is a generic term though, does it need to be capitalised? tommylommykins 17:44, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Ok, the explanation of the real difference will follow in the next edit session. Just give me a litte more time to clarify this. My intention was to put into the articel all the technical stuff. After that the rest will follow automatically. --Techie2 19:04, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I started off this edit because I wanted there to be a page that referenced what the users of these systems will recognise as its name. That's why I created the links from passive entry and passive start which are both terms used in the UK for these systems. I was inclined to do this because I've worked on probably the best system out there and wanted to describe what the best ones should be like. Many users have not seen this technology for long enough yet to know what is good and bad. I don't believe it should be deleted perhaps we should just broaden it to include the information in the advanced key page. It's important to me that if new designers of this system look up the definition of the above terms that they get the benefit of knowledge held by today's system engineers.

--bleakrevel 16:05, 30 January 2007 (GMT)