A fact from Kew. Rhone. appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 April 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the lyrics on the album Kew. Rhone. are filled with anagrams, palindromes, and other verbal puzzles?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock articles
Blegavd's 2015 book is described at www.colinsackett.co.uk. But, for some reason, the web address is blacklisted by Wikipedia. But I now see it is already circumvented by means of www.webcitation.org.Martinevans123 (talk) 21:18, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The reasons cited should be attributed better or labeled as original research as neither are real reaons but are probably at best a joke someone made. In reality the album did not sell well as it was not a pop album and was not one of the fluke non-pop albums to come to wide notice - as Mike Oldfield's Tubular Bells managed to do. But the Sex Pistols and "anti-intelectual zeitgeist" had nothing to do with its lack of sales!
198.90.86.75 (talk) 15:27, 9 January 2021 (UTC) a fan. sslaytor[reply]
Not sure it's a joke. But not sure it's a robust explanation either. Mentioned in a blog review at jazzmusicarchves here where the reviewer describes it as "last relics of the fading prog scene of the 70s". Virgin, like most other commercial labels in 1977, needed to cover all the market bases they could Martinevans123 (talk) 16:03, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
