Jump to content

Talk:Kerma

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

What does the 25th Dynasty of Egypt (700s-600s BC), have to do with the Kingdom of Kerma (ends c.1000 BC)? Yes they were from Nubia, but they can't have been from the by-then-abandoned Kerma. Furius (talk) 03:42, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

age

[edit]

Need to fix the age. According to Geoff Emberling, by 2000 BCE "the city of Kerma itself was a large urban center built around an imposing mud-brick temple complex known as the Western Deffufa." This would just replace the 9000 year old figure, which was confusing. Uses the same source. Dougweller (talk) 13:21, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kerma as the kings of Napatan Kush cemetery?

[edit]

"After the sacking of Kerma, the cemetery was used to host the kings of Napatan Kush from Upper (Southern) Nubia." I doubt it's correct. Can anybody confirm that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Titus Atomicus (talk • contribs) 16:05, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kerma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:57, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In the second paragraph under "Bioarchaeology", there seems to be a personal argument on the topic of human sacrifice (use of the first-person pronoun, and more.) Not sure how to edit: should this paragraph just be deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:30A:C05D:2B90:B529:E2A4:5837:EC3C (talk) 02:00, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 16 June 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page at this time, per the discussion below. For reference, the other discussion mentioned in the request resulted in restoring the Kerma culture title of the other page. Dekimasuよ! 02:50, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kerma → Kerma (city) – proposal at Talk:Kerma kingdom#Requested move 9 June 2024 to move Kerma culture to Kerma with this page specifying the city/archaeological site Alexanderkowal (talk) 22:56, 16 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 20:26, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support as per discussion there. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 09:51, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Babylon/Babylonia precedent. I think there is greater clarity and educational value in the current setup. Srnec (talk) 20:06, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Surely having Kerma (city), with a clarification, provides greater clarity? Alexanderkowal (talk) 20:12, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Having Kerma culture, with a clarification, provides greater clarity, since the name is derivative of that of the village and archaeological site. Calling the culture or kingdom Kerma is somewhat like calling the US government Washington. Nothing wrong with it, but not necessarily indicative of how to title encyclopedia articles. Srnec (talk) 01:02, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Lots of kingdoms had a central city with power radiating from it, like Diarra, Sosso, Aksum etc. I think the Kerma(city) article is more of a sub article to the Kerma culture one, so it makes sense for that to take prominence Alexanderkowal (talk) 08:59, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I haven't seen much evidence yet in both discussions that would substantiate the proposed moves. Can you kindly present us a handful of sources that use plain "Kerma" in the title and which do not just discuss the site, but have the full extent of the Kerma culture as topic? –Austronesier (talk) 15:48, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Good idea, thank you. Some include surrounding sites under the term Kerma, I left out the more ambiguous ones:
    • [1]: Kerma (2011-2012)
    • [2]:Kerma: The Rise of an African Civilization (1976)
    • [3]: The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Nubia: C8 The pre-Kerma culture and the beginning of the Kerma kingdom
    • [4]: Settlement and cemeteries of the Mesolithic and Early Neolithic at el-Barga (Kerma region)
    • [5]: ON THE PERIPHERY OF KERMA - THE HANDESSI HORIZON IN WADI HARIQ, NORTHWESTERN SUDAN
    • [6]: Weapons, Ideology and Identity at Kerma (Upper Nubia, 2500–1500 bc)
    • [7]: The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Nubia: C11 The cities of Kerma and Pnubs-Dokki Gel
    • [8]: SHEEPSKIN FROM ANCIENT KERMA, NORTHERN SUDAN
    • [9]: Marginal Communities and Cooperative Strategies in the Kerma Pastoral State
    • [10]: Behavioral reconstruction of the Kerma era Nubians
    • [11]: Skin, hair and cloth remains from the ancient kerma civilization of Northern Sudan
    Alexanderkowal (talk) 17:37, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    That's a mixed bag. The first two employ "Kerma" for the site; the first uses "Kerma civilization" for the full topic, the second uses "Kerma culture". So they actually support the (old) status quo; "Kerma" for the site, "Kerma culture" for the civilization as a whole. I will have a look at the rest later. –Austronesier (talk) 18:35, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Yeah some of them aren't great examples, but a couple use Kerma alone to refer to the Kerma site as well as neighbouring sites Alexanderkowal (talk) 18:37, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: The disambiguation isn't needed given that the previous discussion to move Kerma Kingdom to Kerma was rejected; it's not disambiguating anything on Wikipedia. Additionally, sources regularly use Kerma for the city and other terms for the culture, so it seems reasonable. Mrfoogles (talk) 23:17, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kerma&oldid=1234385833"