Talk:Kenneth Tam
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 11 March 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]I removed 3/5 of Kenneth's sources due to the fact they were all dead links. Might we consider this article for deletion once again? Hope everything is well. - Skullpaint
Can somebody explain why the author is non-notable? I can sympathise that an article on each of his books might be NN, but why the author himself? So thinking, I've removed the PROD tag. Hope I'm following the right procedure. Regards Buckshot06 (talk) 03:38, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- The article doesn't pass WP:BIO - there are no reliable sources that demonstrate notability. Although he may have written lots of books, he owns / founded the publishers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.210.172 (talk) 09:04, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- There needs to be reviews of his work, and articles about him as an author from reloiable sources to establish his notability. Right now, the article has none of these references, nor does a cursory search find any such material. -- Whpq (talk) 11:07, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
I
- I dont mind a page on an author who has written and sound 10+ books, for me he is notable. But the page seems much longer than is justified. 62.143.59.96 (talk) 15:40, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Book Links
[edit]What is the point of all of the books redirecting to the Danish Defence Command? And why is the list duplicated? Is this the work of an over active publisher seeking publicity? 62.143.59.96 (talk) 15:40, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kenneth Tam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928120845/http://www.exchangemagazine.com/XQuarterly/Archive-education-2-apr07.html to http://www.exchangemagazine.com/XQuarterly/Archive-education-2-apr07.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:58, 4 May 2017 (UTC)